When viewing a file that the user can't edit because they can't write to
the branch, the new, upload, patch, edit and delete functionality is no
longer disabled.
If no user fork of the repository exists, there is now a page to create one.
It will automatically create a fork with a single branch matching the one
being viewed, and a unique repository name will be automatically picked.
When a fork exists, but it's archived, a mirror or the user can't write
code to it, there will instead be a message explaining the situation.
If the usable fork exists, a message will appear at the top of the edit page
explaining that the changes will be applied to a branch in the fork. The
base repository branch will be pushed to a new branch to the fork, and
then the edits will be applied on top.
The suggestion to fork happens when accessing /_edit/, so that for
example online documentation can have an "edit this page" link to
the base repository that does the right thing.
Also includes changes to properly report errors when trying to commit
to a new branch that is protected, and when trying to commit to an
existing branch when choosing the new branch option.
Resolves#9017, #20882
---------
Co-authored-by: Brecht Van Lommel <brecht@blender.org>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Noticed the SQL will be executed 4 times when visit the file render view
page. For a repository which have many pull requests, it maybe slow.
```SQL
2025/06/08 15:24:44 models/issues/pull_list.go:69:GetUnmergedPullRequestsByHeadInfo() [I] [SQL] SELECT * FROM `pull_request` INNER JOIN `issue` ON issue.id = pull_request.issue_id WHERE (head_repo_id = ? AND head_branch = ? AND has_merged = ? AND issue.is_closed = ? AND flow = ?) [393 main false false 0] - 2.004167ms
2025/06/08 15:24:44 models/issues/pull_list.go:69:GetUnmergedPullRequestsByHeadInfo() [I] [SQL] SELECT * FROM `pull_request` INNER JOIN `issue` ON issue.id = pull_request.issue_id WHERE (head_repo_id = ? AND head_branch = ? AND has_merged = ? AND issue.is_closed = ? AND flow = ?) [393 main false false 0] - 1.03975ms
2025/06/08 15:24:44 models/issues/pull_list.go:69:GetUnmergedPullRequestsByHeadInfo() [I] [SQL] SELECT * FROM `pull_request` INNER JOIN `issue` ON issue.id = pull_request.issue_id WHERE (head_repo_id = ? AND head_branch = ? AND has_merged = ? AND issue.is_closed = ? AND flow = ?) [393 main false false 0] - 881.583µs
2025/06/08 15:24:44 models/issues/pull_list.go:69:GetUnmergedPullRequestsByHeadInfo() [I] [SQL] SELECT * FROM `pull_request` INNER JOIN `issue` ON issue.id = pull_request.issue_id WHERE (head_repo_id = ? AND head_branch = ? AND has_merged = ? AND issue.is_closed = ? AND flow = ?) [393 main false false 0] - 935.084µs
```
This PR did a refactor to query it once only.
* Signed SSH commits can look in the UI like on GitHub, just like gpg keys today in Gitea
* SSH format can be added in gitea config
* SSH Signing worked before with DEFAULT_TRUST_MODEL=committer
`TRUSTED_SSH_KEYS` can be a list of additional ssh public key contents
to trust for every user of this instance
Closes#34329
Related #31392
---------
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
The tags synchronization is very slow for a non-mirror repository with
many tags especially forking. This PR make all repositories' tags
synchronization use the same function and remove the low performance
synchronization function. The commit count of tag now will not be stored
into database when syncing. Since the commits count will always be read
from cache or git data, the `NumCommits` in the release table will be
updated for the first read from git data.
Fix#880
Design:
1. A global setting `security.TWO_FACTOR_AUTH`.
* To support org-level config, we need to introduce a better "owner
setting" system first (in the future)
2. A user without 2FA can login and may explore, but can NOT read or
write to any repositories via API/web.
3. Keep things as simple as possible.
* This option only aggressively suggest users to enable their 2FA at the
moment, it does NOT guarantee that users must have 2FA before all other
operations, it should be good enough for real world use cases.
* Some details and tests could be improved in the future since this
change only adds a check and seems won't affect too much.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Adds an API POST endpoint under `/repos/{owner}/{repo}/file-contents`
which receives a list of paths and returns a list of the contents of
these files.
This API endpoint will be helpful for applications like headless CMS
(reference: https://github.com/sveltia/sveltia-cms/issues/198) which
need to retrieve a large number of files by reducing the amount of
needed API calls.
Close#33495
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Fix#33966
```
;; User must sign in to view anything.
;; It could be set to "expensive" to block anonymous users accessing some pages which consume a lot of resources,
;; for example: block anonymous AI crawlers from accessing repo code pages.
;; The "expensive" mode is experimental and subject to change.
;REQUIRE_SIGNIN_VIEW = false
```
Follow #33127
This PR add backend logic and test for "anonymous access", it shares the
same logic as "everyone access", so not too much change.
By the way, split `SettingsPost` into small functions to make it easier
to make frontend-related changes in the future.
Next PR will add frontend support for "anonymous access"
The pagination on the user dashboard sounds unnecessary, this will
change it to a prev/next buttons. For instances with around `10 million`
records in the action table, this option affects how the user dashboard
is loaded on first visit.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Some old code use direct type-casting to get context, it causes
problems.
This PR fixes all legacy problems and use correct `ctx.Value` to get
low-level contexts.
Fix#33518
Dear Gitea team,
first of all, thanks for the great work you're doing with this project.
I'm planning to introduce Gitea at a client site, and noticed that while
there is time recording, there are no project-manager-friendly reports
to actually make use of that data, as were also mentioned by others in
#4870#8684 and #13531.
Since I had a little time last weekend, I had put together something
that I hope to be a useful contribution to this great project (while of
course useful for me too).
This PR adds a new "Worktime" tab to the Organisation level. There is a
date range selector (by default set to the current month), and there are
three possible views:
- by repository,
- by milestone, and
- by team member.
Happy to receive any feedback!
There are several possible future improvements of course (predefined
date ranges, charts, a member time sheet, matrix of repos/members, etc)
but I hope that even in this relatively simple state this would be
useful to lots of people.
<img width="1161" alt="Screen Shot 2022-05-25 at 22 12 58"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/118010/170366976-af00c7af-c4f3-4117-86d7-00356d6797a5.png">
Keep up the good work!
Kristof
---------
Co-authored-by: user <user@kk-git1>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
- Both have `RejectTransfer` and `CancelTransfer` because the permission
checks are not the same. `CancelTransfer` can be done by the doer or
those who have admin permission to access this repository.
`RejectTransfer` can be done by the receiver user if it's an individual
or those who can create repositories if it's an organization.
- Some tests are wrong, this PR corrects them.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
1. add `GetSiteCookieFlashMessage` to help to parse flash message
2. clarify `handleRepoHomeFeed` logic
3. remove unnecessary global variables, use `sync.OnceValue` instead
4. add some tests for `IsUsableUsername` and `IsUsableRepoName`
Major changes:
1. do not sync ".keep" file during tests
2. fix incorrect route handler and empty repo handling (backported as #33253 with tests)
3. do not use `RepoRef`: most of the calls are abuses.
4. Use `git.RefType` instead of a new type definition `RepoRefType` on `context`.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
1. "blob" is not a "ref", it shouldn't (and not unable to) be handled by
`RepoRefByType`
2. the `/blob/{sha}` handle should use the path param "sha" directly
The `ctx.Repo.RefName` was used to be a "short name", it causes a lot of
ambiguity.
This PR does some refactoring and use `RefFullName` to replace the
legacy `RefName`, and simplify RepoAssignment
