2
0
Commit Graph

32 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Lunny Xiao
241d3a4bda Fix get reviewers' bug (#32415)
This PR rewrites `GetReviewer` function and move it to service layer.

Reviewers should not be watchers, so that this PR removed all watchers
from reviewers. When the repository is under an organization, the pull
request unit read permission will be checked to resolve the bug of
#32394

Fix #32394
2024-11-22 10:44:48 -05:00
Calvin K
c061f2ed93 Add reviewers selection to new pull request (#32403)
Users could add reviewers when creating new PRs.

---------

Co-authored-by: splitt3r <splitt3r@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Sebastian Sauer <sauer.sebastian@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: bb-ben <70356237+bboerben@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2024-11-09 04:48:31 +00:00
silverwind
f613758348 Update misspell to 0.5.1 and add misspellings.csv (#30573)
Misspell 0.5.0 supports passing a csv file to extend the list of
misspellings, so I added some common ones from the codebase. There is at
least one typo in a API response so we need to decided whether to revert
that and then likely remove the dict entry.
2024-04-27 08:03:49 +00:00
Jimmy Praet
473609c116 Notify reviewers added via CODEOWNERS (#29842) 2024-03-19 05:28:43 +00:00
Zettat123
113cbc5114 Allow non-admin users to delete review requests (#29057)
Fix #14459

The following users can add/remove review requests of a PR
- the poster of the PR
- the owner or collaborators of the repository
- members with read permission on the pull requests unit
2024-02-24 12:38:43 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
093a9600bf Move notification interface to services layer (#26915)
Extract from #22266
2023-09-05 18:37:47 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
bc9c71cd13 Add transaction when creating pull request created dirty data (#26259)
Fix #26129
Replace #26258 

This PR will introduce a transaction on creating pull request so that if
some step failed, it will rollback totally. And there will be no dirty
pull request exist.

---------

Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-08-10 02:39:21 +00:00
6543
b4e7dd0c22 Less naked returns (#25713)
just a step towards  #25655

and some related refactoring
2023-07-07 05:31:56 +00:00
谈笑风生间
e910dc3961 Rename NotifyPullReviewRequest to NotifyPullRequestReviewRequest (#24988)
after #24481

To keep consistent, maybe pull_request_review_request is better.

## what my pull request does

Rename NotifyPullReviewRequest to NotifyPullRequestReviewRequest.

<img width="1087" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/75628309/2cf91f02-74f2-42fe-a998-0a039b821d8d">
2023-05-31 15:54:46 +08:00
wxiaoguang
af537343c5 Make more functions use ctx instead of db.DefaultContext (#24068)
Continue the "ctx refactoring" work.

There are still a lot db.DefaultContext, incorrect context could cause
database deadlock errors.
2023-04-14 14:18:28 -04:00
Lunny Xiao
53fc37c1f0 refactor some functions to support ctx as first parameter (#21878)
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
2022-12-03 10:48:26 +08:00
flynnnnnnnnnn
487cb6a411 Implement FSFE REUSE for golang files (#21840)
Change all license headers to comply with REUSE specification.

Fix #16132

Co-authored-by: flynnnnnnnnnn <flynnnnnnnnnn@github>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
2022-11-27 18:20:29 +00:00
KN4CK3R
c1e8d1d536 Add context.Context to more methods (#21546)
This PR adds a context parameter to a bunch of methods. Some helper
`xxxCtx()` methods got replaced with the normal name now.

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2022-11-19 16:12:33 +08:00
Jason Song
f246f019b2 Allow poster to choose reviewers (#21084)
Allow the poster of a PR to choose reviewers (add only). 

Solve #20746
2022-09-09 18:27:47 +01:00
Wim
f481b601d6 Add more linters to improve code readability (#19989)
Add nakedret, unconvert, wastedassign, stylecheck and nolintlint linters to improve code readability

- nakedret - https://github.com/alexkohler/nakedret - nakedret is a Go static analysis tool to find naked returns in functions greater than a specified function length.
- unconvert - https://github.com/mdempsky/unconvert - Remove unnecessary type conversions
- wastedassign - https://github.com/sanposhiho/wastedassign -  wastedassign finds wasted assignment statements.
- notlintlint -  Reports ill-formed or insufficient nolint directives
- stylecheck - https://staticcheck.io/docs/checks/#ST - keep style consistent
  - excluded: [ST1003 - Poorly chosen identifier](https://staticcheck.io/docs/checks/#ST1003) and [ST1005 - Incorrectly formatted error string](https://staticcheck.io/docs/checks/#ST1005)
2022-06-20 12:02:49 +02:00
Lunny Xiao
16c0ac94f4 Move issues related files into models/issues (#19931)
* Move access and repo permission to models/perm/access

* fix test

* fix git test

* Move functions sequence

* Some improvements per @KN4CK3R and @delvh

* Move issues related code to models/issues

* Move some issues related sub package

* Merge

* Fix test

* Fix test

* Fix test

* Fix test

* Rename some files
2022-06-13 17:37:59 +08:00
Lunny Xiao
8d11f1ee65 Move almost all functions' parameter db.Engine to context.Context (#19748)
* Move almost all functions' parameter db.Engine to context.Context
* remove some unnecessary wrap functions
2022-05-20 22:08:52 +08:00
Lunny Xiao
49b72df698 Move access and repo permission to models/perm/access (#19350)
* Move access and repo permission to models/perm/access

* Remove unnecessary code
2022-05-11 12:09:36 +02:00
6543
8defd81dd1 more context for models (#19511)
make more usage of context, to have more db transaction in one session

(make diff of  #9307 smaller)
2022-04-28 13:48:48 +02:00
Lunny Xiao
f70d8d3e9b Move some issue methods as functions (#19255)
* Move some issue methods as functions

* Fix bug
2022-03-29 16:57:33 +02:00
Lunny Xiao
af66e85af8 Move organization related structs into sub package (#18518)
* Move organization related structs into sub package

* Fix test

* Fix lint

* Move more functions into sub packages

* Fix bug

* Fix test

* Update models/organization/team_repo.go

Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>

* Apply suggestions from code review

Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>

* Fix fmt

* Follow suggestion from @Gusted

* Fix test

* Fix test

* Fix bug

* Use ctx but db.DefaultContext on routers

* Fix bug

* Fix bug

* fix bug

* Update models/organization/team_user.go

* Fix bug

Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2022-03-29 14:29:02 +08:00
Norwin
6c460d9c0e Allow users to self-request a PR review (#19030)
The review request feature was added in https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/10756,
where the doer got explicitly excluded from available reviewers. I don't see a
functionality or security related reason to forbid this case.

As shown by GitHubs implementation, it may be useful to self-request a review,
to be reminded oneselves about reviewing, while communicating to team mates that a
review is missing.

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2022-03-08 22:48:47 +01:00
Gusted
95c8f0ccf4 Simplify parameter types (#18006)
Remove repeated type declarations in function definitions.
2021-12-20 04:41:31 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
eb46666354 Move accessmode into models/perm (#17828) 2021-11-28 12:58:28 +01:00
Lunny Xiao
c049acd70c Move user related model into models/user (#17781)
* Move user related model into models/user

* Fix lint for windows

* Fix windows lint

* Fix windows lint

* Move some tests in models

* Merge
2021-11-24 17:49:20 +08:00
Lunny Xiao
8b45a8c1ac Move unit into models/unit/ (#17576)
* Move unit into models/unit/

* Rename unit.UnitType as unit.Type
2021-11-09 20:57:58 +01:00
luzpaz
34cc88bca1 Fix various documentation, user-facing, and source comment typos (#16367)
* Fix various doc, user-facing, and source comment typos

Found via `codespell -q 3 -S ./options/locale,./vendor -L ba,pullrequest,pullrequests,readby`
2021-07-08 13:38:13 +02:00
a1012112796
9b1cd5b771 Add review request api (#11355)
* Add review request api

* add : POST /repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{index}/requested_reviewers
* Remove : DELET /repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{index}/requested_reviewers
* fix some request review bug
* block delet request review by models/DeleteReview()

Signed-off-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>

* make fmt

* fix bug

* fix test code

* fix typo

* Apply suggestion from code review @jonasfranz

* fix swagger ref

* fix typo

Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>

* fix comment

* Change response message

* chang response so some simplfy

* Add ErrIllLegalReviewRequest
fix some nits

* make fmt

* Apply suggestions from code review

Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>

* * Add team support
* fix test
* fix an known bug

* fix nit

* fix test

* Apply suggestions from code review

Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>

* update get api and add test

Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
2020-10-20 14:18:25 -04:00
赵智超
32bb94e386 Add team support for review request (#12039)
Add team support for review request

Block #11355

Signed-off-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>

Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
Co-authored-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
2020-10-12 20:55:13 +01:00
zeripath
7d6806f0aa Fix spelling mistake with Rewiew (#11262)
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
2020-04-30 21:24:08 +01:00
赵智超
74b999f7e7 add request review from specific reviewers feature in pull request (#10756)
* add request review feature in pull request

add a way to notify specific reviewers to review like github , by add  or delet a  special type
review . The acton is  is similar to Assign ,  so many code reuse the function and items of
Assignee, but the meaning and result is different.

The Permission style is is similar to github, that only writer can add a review request from Reviewers,
but the poster can recall and remove a review request after a reviwer has revied even if he don't have
Write Premission. only manager , the poster and reviewer of a request review can remove it.

The reviewers can be requested to review contain all readers for private repo , for public, contain
all writers and watchers.

The offical Review Request will block merge if Reject can block it.

an other change: add ui otify for Assignees.

Co-authored-by: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>

Signed-off-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>

* new change

* add placeholder string

* do some changes follow #10238 to add review requests num on lists also
change icon for review requests to eye

Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
2020-04-06 19:33:34 +03:00
Lunny Xiao
3926ca77f3 Move more issue assignee code from models to issue service (#8690)
* Move more issue assignee code from models to issue service

* fix test
2019-10-28 10:11:50 +08:00